GA, ECOSOC & RB
Our GA, ECOSOC, and RB committees are perfect for delegates looking to debate in a larger setting. All committees have expert chairs trained to give all delegates feedback and foster a dynamic, yet educational committee experience. We will be offering two beginner committees: UNHRC and DISEC. These committees are perfect for delegates just beginning their MUN journeys! We will also be offering one advanced committee: UNEP. This committee is perfect for delegates who have tons of MUN experience and are looking to bring their public speaking and debating skills to the next level!
-
Director: Alicia Deng
Topic 1: Support Systems and Infrastructure for Victims of Human Trafficking
Human trafficking— widely considered the modern-day slavery— is the act of recruiting, transporting, or harboring individuals by force, fraud, or coercion. Victims of human trafficking are subject to various forms of exploitation including labor, sexual acts, and even organ trafficking. While international and domestic bodies have made efforts to combat human trafficking, support systems for victims remain inconsistent, underfunded, and often inaccessible. Even as individuals escape exploitation, they often face other barriers such as lack of shelter or mental health resources and economic insecurity, preventing long-term recovery and reintegration into society. The United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) will discuss existing and prospective strategies for supporting victims and survivors of human trafficking, from preventative and rescue measures to rehabilitation and survivor-centered opportunities.
Topic 2: Drug Abuse and Dependency in Trafficking Networks
Drugs are widely circulated within trafficking networks as a means of control and profit. Many victims develop addiction and dependency, as substances are used to coerce and psychologically trap them in exploitative situations. Compliance often becomes intertwined with dependency. In some cases, as individuals become subject to drug use, they are also forced to participate in drug production and distribution, further entangling them in trafficking and criminal networks. This committee aims to discuss the role of drug dependency in human trafficking, both within trafficking circles and in survivor support. Delegates will explore potential strategies and frameworks to address the intertwinement of trafficking networks and drug production and distribution.
-
Director: Lauren Kim
Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems (LAWS): The Future of Warfare or a Global Threat?
As artificial intelligence continues to reshape modern warfare, nations are racing to develop Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems (LAWS)—machines capable of selecting and engaging targets without direct human control. Supporters argue that these systems could reduce battlefield casualties and enhance military precision, but critics warn of ethical dilemmas, accountability concerns, and the risk of an AI-driven arms race. With major military powers investing heavily in LAWS while others call for an outright ban, the world faces a critical decision: Should autonomous weapons be prohibited under international law, or is regulation the key to ensuring their responsible use? Delegates must grapple with questions of security, ethics, and equity in military technology, working to prevent these weapons from destabilizing global peace or falling into the hands of rogue actors.
Militarization of Space: Preventing an Arms Race Beyond Earth
Space was once seen as a frontier for exploration and scientific discovery, but as nations invest in space defense technologies, concerns over militarization are growing. The establishment of space forces, the development of anti-satellite weapons (ASATs), and the increasing militarization of satellite networks have raised alarms about the potential for conflict beyond Earth’s atmosphere. While treaties like the Outer Space Treaty of 1967 promote peaceful cooperation, gaps in regulation leave room for an arms race in orbit. Should space remain a demilitarized zone, or do nations have the right to defend their assets beyond Earth? As competition in space intensifies, delegates must determine how to balance security concerns with the long-standing goal of keeping space free from warfare. Will international cooperation prevail, or are we on the brink of a new Cold War—this time, in the stars?
-
Director: Christopher Li
Topic 1: Electrifying Public Transit
As countries worldwide increasingly prioritize sustainability, transitioning from fossil fuel-powered public transportation to electric systems has become an important issue. Developed countries have made significant investments in electric rail and buses, but problems remain with funding, infrastructure development, and disparate access to underprivileged communities. Emerging nations deal with other issues such as grid reliability, the high upfront costs of electrification, and a lack of incentives for private engagement. This committee will look into measures to accelerate the adoption of electric public transit while weighing the environmental benefits with practicality for their country. Delegates must consider international cooperation, technological advancements, and policies that promote sustainable transit options while addressing implementation feasibility across countries.
Topic 2: Slum TransformationMore than a billion people on Earth live in slums that lack adequate housing, suffer from poor hygiene, and lack access to basic amenities. Rapid urbanization, inadequate housing, and rising living costs have contributed to the expansion of slums. Governments, non-governmental organizations, and international organizations have attempted solutions ranging from resettlement to community-led development initiatives. However, many solutions face challenges such as forced evictions, budgetary limits, or political resistance. In this committee, delegates will discuss sustainable and practical solutions for slum transformation while balancing economic development with human rights and quality of life. Delegates should consider the economic and cultural features of informal settlements as they relate to past failures and proposed solutions.
-
Director: Amanda Wu
Topic 1: The Future of Digital Health
With the rise of developed modern technologies and artificial intelligence, we may begin to think of ways to leverage these abilities in the world of health. Especially for rural communities that may not have easy access to clinics or medical professionals, digital health can be implemented to provide healthcare to larger populations more efficiently and at a lower cost. Digital health also carries significance for developed countries, as it can streamline the process of disease diagnosis. Automated systems can pick up clues from a conversation between a doctor and patient and use this information along with the patient's existing profile to perform analysis on the situation. Not only does digital health increase access and reduce cost, but it also minimizes errors associated with human-operated healthcare and diagnoses. However, with the widespread use of automation and digital health comes the question of regulation and privacy. Where does the data being used by these systems go, and how can medical information be contained? When might personal treatment be more advantageous than digital treatment and how should that be evaluated?
Topic 2: Neglected Tropical Diseases
There are 17 diseases classified as neglected tropical diseases (NTDs), highly debilitating conditions that primarily affect impoverished communities in tropical regions around the world. These diseases include trachoma, a blindness caused by flies; onchocerciasis, river blindness caused by a worm parasite; and rabies. Among impoverished populations, women and children tend to be disproportionately affected by NTDs. They are not adequately addressed by government funding and significantly contribute to morbidity in low-income countries. If left untreated, NTDs can continue to lead to harmful cycles of poverty, malnutrition, lack of clean water and sanitation, and stigma towards developing countries. There are a variety of ways in which NTDs can be targeted, and it is up to delegates to investigate how to do so with the most cost-effective, universally applicable strategies.
-
Director: Nathan Kwon
Topic 1: Strategies for Sustainable Populations Amid Declining Birth Rates
The majority of developed nations are experiencing drastically declining birth rates that threaten population sustainability and economic futures. Low fertility rates, aging populations, and shrinking workforces are imposing increasing pressure on established systems including social security, economic stability, and environmental sustainability. The focus of this committee is to explore holistic measures that create stability in the population and respond to the causes of low birth rates. The delegates are to propose solutions in a manner that balances population interests without compromising human rights, community well-being, and economic and environmental sustainability for future generations.
Topic 2: Addressing Past and Future Urban Inequalities
By 2050, the United Nations projects that nearly 68% of the world's population will live in an urban area. Urban areas bring social and economic progress but also have the potential to reinforce inequality in access to housing, health care, education, and jobs, particularly for the marginalized. The mission of this committee is to determine how past imbalances can be compensated for and how policies can attempt to balance urban imbalances in the future, ensuring an equal increase in the living standard of the growing urban population. The delegates are entrusted with the duty of creating knowledgeable and creative policies to ensure inclusive and sustainable urban growth, such that no one is left behind as cities evolve.
-
Director: Jojo Lee
Topic 1: Reforming Sentencing Standards for Major Crimes
South Korea has faced growing criticism for giving relatively short prison sentences for serious crimes like rape and murder. High-profile cases have sparked public outrage, with many calling for stricter punishments to ensure justice for victims and rebuild trust in the legal system. In contrast, on average, all sentences are more severe in the U.S. than in South Korea, when comparing similar degrees of cases. There is a great variety in sentencing for violent crimes worldwide. In some countries, shorter sentences are emphasized in favor of rehabilitation. In others, neither punishment nor rehabilitation is emphasized, and many crimes go virtually unpunished. The goal of this committee is to assess sentencing disparities for serious crimes worldwide, compare different legal approaches, and propose reforms that balance justice, rehabilitation, deterrence, and public trust in the country’s legal system. Delegates must consider how these changes could impact crime prevention, rehabilitation, and countries' international legal reputations.
Topic 2: Tackling the Rise of Counterfeit Luxury Goods
The global counterfeit luxury goods market is growing fast, supporting organized crime, exploiting cheap labor, and causing major financial losses for legitimate brands. Fake designer items are sold everywhere—from street markets to online shops and social media—making them easy to buy while also making enforcement harder. Countries like South Korea, where luxury goods are in high demand, face extra challenges as counterfeits continue to spread. Key players in this issue include luxury brands, law enforcement, e-commerce platforms, and international regulators. In this committee, delegates will examine the impact of counterfeiting, evaluate current laws and enforcement, and propose stronger marketplace regulations, better oversight, and global cooperation to fight the sale of fake luxury goods.
-
Director: James Alexander Kim
Topic 1: Countering Underwater Threats to Critical Infrastructure
Recent incidents, such as the Nord Stream pipeline explosions and suspected sabotage of undersea cables in the Baltic and North Seas, have raised alarm over the security of critical underwater infrastructure. As NATO nations rely heavily on submarine cables for global communications and energy transport, ensuring their protection is a growing priority. In response, NATO has launched initiatives like Task Force X to strengthen undersea surveillance and resilience, but challenges remain in detecting, deterring, and responding to such threats. Delegates must evaluate the effectiveness of current NATO strategies, explore technological advancements such as unmanned underwater vehicles (UUVs), and consider geopolitical tensions—particularly in light of Russian and other state and non-state actor activities—while maintaining economic stability and environmental considerations.
Topic 2: Arctic Security and NATO’s Strategic Presence
As Arctic ice recedes, the region is rapidly becoming a new frontier of geopolitical competition. Russia has expanded its military presence by reopening Soviet-era bases and deploying advanced weaponry, while China continues to assert influence through its "Polar Silk Road" ambitions. Meanwhile, NATO members like the U.S., Canada, and Norway are increasing military exercises and infrastructure to counter these developments. With shifting power dynamics, NATO must determine its approach—whether through increased patrols, enhanced joint operations, or deeper collaboration with Arctic partners—while considering environmental concerns, indigenous communities, and international law. Delegates will need to assess NATO’s strategic interests in the Arctic and propose measures to ensure regional stability without provoking unnecessary escalation.
-
Director: Alexis Lam
Topic 1: Textile Waste and Circular Economies:
The fast fashion industry generates over 92 million tons of textile waste each year, much of which ends up in landfills or is incinerated. With rapidly cycling microtrends and the use of low-quality materials made from plastics, clothing is often discarded after only a few wears. This waste disproportionately affects developing countries and contributes to microplastic pollution, harmful emissions, and overflowing landfills. To combat this growing issue, the concept of a circular economy offers a sustainable alternative. By rethinking the entire lifecycle of clothing, countries can reduce environmental harm and minimize waste. However, circular economies face issues with inadequate infrastructure and limited public awareness that prevent real global progress from happening. In this committee, delegates explore how the international community can promote circular economy solutions to address textile waste. The delegates will also have the opportunity to learn and discuss extended producer responsibility (EPR), global recycling standards, sustainable innovation, and shifting consumer behavior toward long-term environmental responsibility.
Topic 2: The Textile Industry and Water Pollution
The textile industry is one of the world’s largest polluters of freshwater, with dyeing and finishing processes alone responsible for up to 20% of global industrial water pollution. Toxic chemicals used in textile production like azo dyes, heavy metals, and formaldehyde often drain off directly into rivers and waterways, especially in countries with less regulated environmental protections. These pollutants pose serious health risks to local communities, destroy local aquatic ecosystems, and contribute to long-term environmental degradation. As global demand for fast fashion continues to rise, so does the pressure on water systems and waste management infrastructures. The lack of regulation, transparency, and accountability in textile supply chains has made it difficult to monitor and mitigate the environmental impact of production. In this committee, delegates will be tasked with addressing the dire need for international standards on wastewater treatment, chemical use, and sustainable production practices. They will also have the opportunity to discuss different regulatory frameworks, green chemistry alternatives, supply chain transparency, and corporate responsibility within the textile industry.
Specialized & Crisis
Our Specialized and Crisis committees are perfect for the delegates looking for a smaller committee experience! These committees are all fast-paced, with unique and creative topics that will challenge delegates’ creativity. They follow a slightly different system of procedure than GA, ECOSOC, and RB committees. We will be offering one advanced committee: The Mongol Empire. This committee is perfect for delegates who want to test their creativity, enjoy complex problem-solving, and want a fun, dynamic, and warm environment to debate in!
-
Director: Jack Ludwick
Holding the World Cup in a War-Torn Country:
In 2044, FIFA accepted the bid to host the 2050 World Cup in the United States. However, the country succumbed to a Civil War in 2048, two years before the World Cup was intended to begin. Whilst the American infrastructure has met the tournament requirements and internal American pressures are to continue with the hosting process, the FIFA community is divided on how to proceed with the upcoming World Cup. Many within the FIFA Congress believe the war should be over by the tournament and wish to continue with the games as planned. Others hope to swiftly select a new location, and some hope to cancel the games altogether. As bribery and corruption continue to plague the FIFA Congress and extreme pressure from the international community of governments, politicians, players, and fans mounts, a decision regarding the future of the games needs to be made urgently. The members of the FIFA Council must work together to come up with a solution for the 2050 World Cup.
FIFA Threatened:
After the 2050 World Cup, many International Intelligence Agencies uncovered that numerous FIFA officials had been committing acts of fraud, embezzlement, and bribery in connection with their actions in World Cups dating back to 2018. With heavy international shame brought to FIFA and a leadership crisis forming within the Congress, a new football association “WOFF” (World of Football Fun) begins its rise to power, with many national football organizations being tempted to leave the troubled FIFA world for the promising future of WOFF. FIFA Council members must create a new system of leadership, deal with their international reputation, and fight against WOFF in order to keep their monopoly on international football and the longevity of football alive.
-
Director: Thomas Lin
Constitution of the Korean Provisional Government
The March 1st Movement is one of the most important events in the history of Korea. The Korean Provisional Government, established on April 11, 1919, aims to transition Korea from a monarchy to a democratic republic. It adopts the Provisional Charter of the Republic of Korea, which declared Korean sovereignty and established executive, legislative, and judicial branches. However, the newly established government must also organize itself to protect Korean sovereignty and citizens while fighting against imperial Japanese rule. The first President, Syngman Rhee, along with various other Korean leaders, foreign diplomats, and Japanese officials, must find ways to advance their interests while also seeking common ground to ensure the long-term sustainability of the Korean Republic. To achieve this, the Provisional Government needs your help to draft a constitution that is not only long-lasting but also considers the upsides and downsides of other contemporary governance structures to create a framework that best suits Korea. As the founding members of a new vision for Korea, delegates are encouraged to reflect on the qualities of a long-lasting state. How can delegates ensure the competing interests of the world are satisfied while also preserving Korean identity?
Korean Sovereignty
Before the establishment of the Provisional Government, Korea (Joseon Dynasty) was a tributary state of the Qing Dynasty and later fell under Japanese control. With over 500 years of tributary relations and recent experiences of colonial rule, the issue of Korea’s sovereignty and national identity has become more pressing than ever. The movement has sparked a new national consciousness and unity among the Korean people, which persists despite Japanese rule. Throughout the movement, even as international media highlights Japanese brutality, the lack of autonomy and a clear vision of national sovereignty makes Korea’s path to independence difficult, especially amidst geopolitical tensions. As delegates of this special committee, you are encouraged to examine the legacy of the March 1st Movement, the international stance on East Asia at the time, and the political merits of self-determination and conquest, all while considering your individual roles and interests. How does Korea approach its eventual hope of independence? Is nonviolence sufficient, or should the people take up arms? And how does Korea seek support from the international community?
-
Director: Gloria Kunnapilly
Topic 1: The Assassination of Empress Myeongseong
It is October of 1895 and Empress Myeongseong has just been assassinated. Due to her advocacy for modernization and close ties with Russia, she was a prime target for her political opponents. Her death has plunged the Royal Court into chaos. There is widespread suspicion that key figures within the court may have either aided the assassination or failed to act in Korea's best interests. With the future of the Korean Empire hanging in the balance, delegates (consisting of royal family members, court officials, and foreign diplomats) must determine who within the court can be trusted. The task at hand is not only to uncover potential traitors, but also restore order in the Empire.
Topic 2: Korea at a Crossroads
With the assassination of Empress Myeongseong and King Gojong’s weakened position, Korea stands at a crossroads. The court is fragmented, with competing factions vying for control. Meanwhile, Japan, Russia, and other foreign powers seek to influence the country’s future. In this climate of uncertainty, delegates must decide whether to pursue aggressive reforms to modernize Korea, preserve traditional power structures, or seek to maintain independence in the face of external pressures. Delegates should negotiate a path forward that secures Korea’s sovereignty while navigating the complex geopolitics of East Asia.
-
Director: Andrey Solokov
It is August 11th, 1259. Möngke Khan, the fourth Khan of the Great Mongol Nation died in the siege of Diaoyucheng. Unlike the Khans before him, Möngke Khan left no clear successor and an immense power vacuum behind. This vacuum cannot hold for long, as it can clearly be filled by the many lords within the empire’s ranks. A great council now assembles, with the purpose of ensuring the internal stability of the Mongol Empire. With the death of the Khan, the council faces a choice: will it preserve tradition and attempt to select a new Khan to rule itself through the continuation of Genghis Khan’s glorious conquests, or will it choose to reform itself into a different form of government, in an attempt to alleviate the risk of such a succession crisis happening ever again?
Topic 1: Tradition
In the face of Möngke Khan's untimely death, the Mongol Empire must be poised to continue its storied tradition of conquest and governance. By adhering to the time-honored practice of selecting a new Khan through a kurultai, the empire can maintain the unity and strength that have defined its glorious past. This path ensures the continuation of Genghis Khan's vision, where the Great Khan leads the empire to further victories and expansion. It also presents an opportunity for any ambitious enough Mongol to challenge the authority of the Great Khan, potentially bringing about a terrible civil war. The question then remains: Will the Mongols preserve their heritage and choose a leader who will embody the spirit of their legendary founder?
Topic 2: Progress
The sudden demise of Möngke Khan left behind a succession crisis but also presented the Empire with an opportunity to pivot away from tradition and forge a new path. By reforming its governance structure, the empire can mitigate the risks of future succession crises and adapt to the evolving needs of its vast territories. This bold step could usher in a more stable and efficient system, allowing the Mongols to secure Genghis Khan’s legacy without the turmoil of repeated power struggles. That being said, choosing to reform the Empire in the wrong ways may cause internal instability and bring about the downfall of the whole empire. Given this opportunity, will the Mongols be able to successfully create a stronger, more united Mongol Empire?